1. unicornavocado:

    You Are Loved - Defiance, Ohio

    (via sexisweird)

     

  2. fckthestate:

    stupidnervous:

    Good Things, Take 3017

    Pretty Girls (The Mover)- Against Me!

    sometimes at night I pray to wake
    a different person in a different place

     
  3. catp0rn:

    This cute baby still hasn’t found a home :-( Email me @ nora_mohammed96@hotmail.com if you’re in or around northern NJ and interested!

     
  4. (Source: qock, via benjmin)

     

  5. fabulouslyfreespirited:

    If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies.
    In what’s being called the biggest celebrity hacking incident in internet history, more than 100 female celebrities have had their private nude images stolen and published online. The bulk of the images posted have been officially confirmed as belonging to Jennifer Lawrence, but a complete list of victims’ names - including Krysten Ritter, Kate Upton, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Rihanna, Brie Larson and Kirsten Dunst - has been subsequently published. (Link does not contain pictures, only names.)
    The images were first uploaded by an anonymous member of the underground internet sewer known as 4chan and have since been enthusiastically shared across platforms like Reddit and Twitter. A representative for Lawrence has confirmed the images are real, condemning the theft of them as a “flagrant violation of privacy” and adding that “The authorities have been contacted and will prosecute anyone who posts the stolen photos.”
    There are a few different issues that a criminal act like this brings up, but before I get into them it’s necessary to make one thing clear: If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies. These images - which I have not seen and which I will not look for - are intimate, private moments belonging only to the people who appear in them and who they have invited to see them. To have those moments stolen and broadcast to the world is an egregious act of psychic violence which constitutes a form of assault.
    The people sharing these images are perpetuating an ongoing assault. The people gleefully looking at them are witnessing and enjoying an ongoing assault. When you have been asked by victims of a crime like this not to exacerbate the pain of that crime and you continue to do so anyway, you are consciously deciding that your enjoyment, your rights and perhaps even just your curiosity are more important than the safety and dignity of the people you’re exploiting.
    That out of the way, let’s get a few other things straight.
    1. This is not a ‘scandal’
    It’s a crime, and we should be discussing it as such. Some media outlets are salaciously reporting it otherwise, as if the illegal violation of privacy involving intimate images is little more than subject for gossip. When associated with sex, the word ‘scandal’ has been typically interpreted as something that assigns responsibility to all parties involved, a consensual act unfortunately discovered and for which everyone owes an explanation or apology. Remember when private nude photos of Vanessa Hudgens (whose name also appears on the list of victims) were leaked online and Disney forced her to publicly apologise for her “lapse in judgment” and hoped she had “learned a valuable lesson”? Never mind that Hudgens was an adult and a victim of privacy violation - the ‘scandal’ was painted as something for which she owed her fans an apology. Which leads us to:
    2. These women do not ‘only have themselves to blame’
    While depressing, it’s sadly unsurprising to see some people arguing that Lawrence et al brought this on themselves. Part of living in a rape culture is the ongoing expectation that women are responsible for protecting themselves from abuse, and that means avoiding behaviour which might be later ‘exploited’ by the people who are conveniently never held to account for their actions. But women are entitled to consensually engage in their sexuality any way they see fit. If that involves taking nude self portraits for the enjoyment of themselves or consciously selected others, that’s their prerogative.
    Victims of crime do not have an obligation to accept dual responsibility for that crime. Women who take nude photographs of themselves are not committing a criminal act, and they shouldn’t ‘expect’ to become victims to one, as actress Mary E. Winstead pointed out on Twitter. 
    Sending a photograph of your breasts to one person isn’t consenting to having the whole world see those breasts, just as consenting to sex with one person isn’t the same as giving permission for everyone else to fu*k you. Victim blaming isn’t okay, even if it does give you a private thrill to humiliate the female victims of sexual exploitation.
    3. It doesn’t matter that ‘damn, she looks good and should own it!’
    Stealing and sharing the private photographs of women doesn’t become less of a crime just because you approve them for fapping activity. I’m sure many of the women on this list are confident of their sexual attractiveness. It doesn’t mean they don’t value their privacy or shouldn’t expect to enjoy the same rights to it as everyone else. It also doesn’t mean they want strangers sweating over their images. That line of thinking comes from the same school which instructs women to either ignore of welcome sexual harassment when it’s seemingly ‘positive’ in its sentiments.
    None of these women are likely to give a shit that you think their bodies are ‘tight, damn’. Despite what society reinforces to us about the public ownership of women’s bodies, we are not entitled to co-opt and objectify them just because we think we can defend it as a compliment.
    I will not be seeking out these images out and I urge everyone else to avoid doing the same. I hope that all the women who have been victimised here are being appropriately supported by the authorities and their network of friends. And I hope sincerely that more people take a stand against this kind of behaviour.
    Because this incident aside, it strikes me as deeply ironic that we will vehemently protest a free Facebook messenger app because we’re outraged at reports that it can access our phone’s numbers, and yet turn around and excuse the serving up of women’s bodies for our own pleasure. Our appreciation is no less disgusting just because it’s accompanied by the sound of one hand clapping.

    (via dentonsocialists)

     
  6. emerghost:

    necessaryveganism:

    Animal agriculture is the number one reason for global warming, deforestation, water shortage and ocean dead-zones.

    And there’s a reason you never hear about it. 

    Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Project

    Dairy and meat industries are a BUSINESS. They exist purely for PROFIT. They do not care about the environment, or peoples’ health, or animals. 

    (via queerveganfeminist)

     
  7. laciphotography:

    Wallie will do anything for organic lettuce…even yoga.

    (via wizard-vegan)

     
  8.  
  9. reginasworld:

    The series, simply called “Morning Views From the Tent,” follows photographer Oleg Grigoryev's travels to mountains throughout Russia and surrounding countries, capturing them all through the frame of his tent flap.

     
  10.  
  11.  
  12. (Source: apm30, via blast--perception)

     

  13. skin-father:

    I cut my hair on Tuesday, I thought it would help you stay away. From the New York subway, world unraveling.

    (Source: chloranthy, via twerkspotting)

     

  14. "I have an entire forest living inside of me and you have carved your initials into every tree."
    — Pavana. (via vinylandvodka)

    (Source: maza-dohta, via burn-the-brightest)

     
  15. aaronfunandmental:

    barbie-verified:

    satyrday:

    sarahjhuynh:

    gracediamondsfear:

    assbutt-in-the-garrison:

    alicetookadrink:

    Hey so to protect one of my friends I’ve decided to help her out by posting this on my blog instead. Please share this!

    "This is Ian Foote. My husband and I met this man at one of my shows at the Rickshaw Theatre in East Vancouver last week and I added him on Facebook that same night because he and his girlfriend seemed nice enough.

    WARNING TO WOMEN IN EAST VAN.

    This man is a potential rapist who openly admits to having to forcibly stop himself from raping on the daily. Please spread this around, I want everyone in Vancouver to know to stay far away from this man.”

    (Vancouver BC)

    Please please please signal boost the fuck out of this you never know where your followers are. Thank you ♥

    What fucking piece of shit.

    This is a nightmare.  He thinks he’s being clever and cute about his disgusting tendencies.  And I’m sure once all of this gets out and the world understands what a monster he is he’ll claim it was all one big joke or social experiment or some shit.  Or that he was being sarcastic to prove a point. 

    Ian Foote

    Ian Foote

    Ian Foote

    Ian Foote

    rapists think all men are rapists

    Okay so I went on his Facebook page (moron didn’t put it on private) and found some more disgusting things

    On the same status, he said this in the comments

    Here are some of his other posts:

    Ian Foote thinks rape is normal.
    Ian Foote thinks all men want to rape women.
    Ian Foote harbors violent fantasies about non-consensual contact with women.
    Ian Foote should probably be investigated to make sure he hasn’t already raped people.
    Ian Foote wants to rape women.
    Ian Foote should be avoided at all costs, to avoid becoming a victim of his depraved sexual violence.

    Ian Foote, folks. Ian Foote.

    (via queerveganfeminist)